Files
EOS/AGENTS.md
T
Bobby NoelteandClaude Opus 5.5 dd41e5d57c chore(ai): add agent self-review and a CI check for agent-assisted PRs
Additional changes
Agents write a task plan to .scratch/<branch>/plan.md and self-review with code-review
Agents fix hard violations, report judgement calls and rerun the self-review before every push
Agents declare the review in a Self-review section of the pull request body
Add the ai-self-review workflow and scripts/check_pr_self_review.py for pull requests into main
Detect agents by Assisted-by or Anthropic Co-Authored-By trailers, body markers or the AI box
Fail only on a missing Self-review section or a missing, malformed or stale Reviewed SHA
Note an unticked AI-assisted box and malformed optional lines without failing
Comment on the pull request how to fix a failure and update that one comment on later runs
Show the same report in the job summary and accept Windows line endings in the body
Skip dependabot and release pull requests
Run on pull_request_target with the base branch's script, never pull request code
Add the pull request template: the pr skill's sections plus Checklist and Self-review
Require always valid optimization parameters in the energy-domain skill
Require datetimeutil for date and time handling in new and changed code in AGENTS.md
Require the Assisted-by trailer on agent commits in the commit-messages skill
Add tests for the check in tests/test_ai.py
Add GLOSSARY.md and the agent tracker docs in docs/agents/
Add decision record docs/adr/0001 with an ADR index in the docs toctree
Document the workflow in docs/develop/ai.md and CONTRIBUTING.md
Exclude docs/agents from Sphinx and PyMarkdown and ignore .scratch/
Document cz check instead of make gitlint for commit messages in docs/develop/ai.md

Assisted-by: Claude Code (claude-opus-5-5)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-11 15:37:33 +01:00

164 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown

# AGENTS.md — Akkudoktor-EOS
Akkudoktor-EOS is a Python-based energy management and optimization system. It
provides energy forecasts, optimization, energy management plans, and
integrations with local energy devices and controllers.
The project prioritizes reliable local operation, clear interfaces,
maintainable code, testability, and type safety.
## Rules for every change
- Follow existing architecture and coding conventions.
- Prefer small, focused changes that preserve established interfaces and
behavior.
- Use type annotations for functions, methods, and relevant variables.
- Write Google-style docstrings for modules, classes, and public
functions/methods, following surrounding code.
- Keep code compatible with the supported Python version (`pyproject.toml`).
- Avoid introducing unnecessary dependencies.
- Use descriptive, domain-meaningful names.
- Never use production `assert` for input validation or runtime error
handling; use explicit exceptions.
- Use existing logging facilities and conventions.
- Follow existing patterns for config, validation, error reporting, resource
management.
- Preserve compatibility with existing tests and supported integrations unless
a change explicitly requires otherwise.
- **Create, parse, convert and compare dates, times, durations and time zones
with `akkudoktoreos.utils.datetimeutil`** (`to_datetime`, `to_duration`,
`to_timezone`, `to_time`, `compare_datetimes`, `DateTime`, `Duration`). Do not call
`datetime`, `pendulum` or `dateutil` directly. Exceptions: `datetimeutil.py`
itself, and boundaries where a third-party API needs its own type (pandas,
NumPy, the standard library), converted right at the boundary. Applies to new
and changed code; migrate existing direct calls only where the change touches
them anyway.
- **Optimization parameters are always valid**: their preparation never fails
and never cancels an optimization run. See the `energy-domain` skill.
- Commits written or co-written by an agent end with the trailer
`Assisted-by: <tool> (<model id>)`, see the `commit-messages` skill.
- Never use the workspace `.venv`: run `uv`, `make` and all Python tools in a
virtual environment outside the workspace (`UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT`), see
`ai/skills/python-environment/SKILL.md`.
## Skills
Detailed rules live in `ai/skills/`. Load the relevant skill for the task:
| Skill | Load when |
|---|---|
| `ai/skills/application-configuration/SKILL.md` | Config, Pydantic models, defaults |
| `ai/skills/commit-messages/SKILL.md` | Creating/checking commit messages |
| `ai/skills/energy-domain/SKILL.md` | Optimization, adapters, units/signs |
| `ai/skills/filename-conventions/SKILL.md` | Creating/renaming files |
| `ai/skills/python-environment/SKILL.md` | Before running uv, make, pytest, mypy, ruff or any Python |
| `ai/skills/python-quality/SKILL.md` | Writing/modifying Python |
| `ai/skills/rest-api/SKILL.md` | Adding/changing REST endpoints, API error responses |
| `ai/skills/testing/SKILL.md` | Adding/updating tests, bug fixes |
### Engineering skills
General engineering workflows from
[mattpocock/skills](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills) (MIT, see
`ai/skills/engineering/LICENSE`). The project rules above take precedence
where they overlap.
| Skill | Load when |
|---|---|
| `ai/skills/engineering/code-review/SKILL.md` | Reviewing a branch, PR or changes since a fixed point |
| `ai/skills/engineering/codebase-design/SKILL.md` | Designing module interfaces, seams, testability |
| `ai/skills/engineering/diagnosing-bugs/SKILL.md` | Diagnosing hard bugs and performance regressions |
| `ai/skills/engineering/domain-modeling/SKILL.md` | Domain terminology, glossary, ADRs |
| `ai/skills/engineering/pr/SKILL.md` | Writing a PR body |
| `ai/skills/engineering/prototype/SKILL.md` | Throwaway prototype to answer a design question |
| `ai/skills/engineering/research/SKILL.md` | Researching a question against primary sources |
| `ai/skills/engineering/tdd/SKILL.md` | Test-first features or bug fixes |
| `ai/skills/engineering/wizard/SKILL.md` | Interactive bash wizard for steps only a human can do |
Load these only when the user asks for them by name:
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `ai/skills/engineering/ask-matt/SKILL.md` | Pick the skill or flow that fits a situation |
| `ai/skills/engineering/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md` | Interview to sharpen a plan, writing ADRs and glossary |
| `ai/skills/engineering/implement/SKILL.md` | Implement work from a spec or tickets |
| `ai/skills/engineering/implement-spec/SKILL.md` | Implement the result of `to-spec` and `to-tickets` |
| `ai/skills/engineering/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md` | Report deepening opportunities, then grill one |
| `ai/skills/engineering/retro/SKILL.md` | Retrospective on a coding session |
| `ai/skills/engineering/setup-matt-pocock-skills/SKILL.md` | One-time setup of issue tracker, labels, domain docs |
| `ai/skills/engineering/to-spec/SKILL.md` | Turn the conversation into a spec on the tracker |
| `ai/skills/engineering/to-tickets/SKILL.md` | Break a plan into tracer-bullet tickets |
| `ai/skills/engineering/triage/SKILL.md` | Triage issues and external PRs |
| `ai/skills/engineering/wayfinder/SKILL.md` | Plan large work as decision tickets |
## Task plan and self-review
- Before writing code for a task beyond a small fix, agree on a plan with the
user and write it to `.scratch/<branch>/plan.md` (the **task plan**, see
`GLOSSARY.md`). `.scratch/` is ignored by git; never commit it. Keep the plan
up to date when the user changes the task.
- When the task is done, run the **self-review**: the `code-review` skill
against the base branch (usually `main`). The spec is the GitHub issue the
commits reference, if any, otherwise the task plan.
- The coding standards for the review are `CONTRIBUTING.md`, this file and the
project skills in `ai/skills/` (not `ai/skills/engineering/`).
- Fix every **hard violation** (breach of a documented project rule) yourself,
rerun the checks and the self-review. Report **judgement calls** (code
smells, possible scope creep) to the user without acting on them.
- Write the pull request body to `.scratch/<branch>/pr.md` with the `pr` skill,
in the structure of `.github/pull_request_template.md`: the skill's
`## Summary`, `## Evidence` and `## Merge Danger` (with optional
**Breaking:** and **Security:** lines), then `## Checklist` with the
"AI-assisted" box ticked. It ends with a `## Self-review` section in
exactly this format. CI requires the `Reviewed:` line and notes problems
with the others, see `docs/develop/ai.md`:
```markdown
## Self-review
Reviewed: <full 40-character SHA of the reviewed HEAD commit>
Base: <base branch or commit>
Standards: <n> hard, <m> judgement
Spec: <k> open (source: <#issue | .scratch/<branch>/plan.md | none>)
- <one line per open finding or judgement call, and why it was left>
Assisted-by: <tool> (<model id>)
```
Keep footers the tool adds itself below it, e.g. Claude Code's
`Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)`.
- The self-review runs once at the end of the task, not before every commit.
Before every push (e.g. of fixes after review feedback), rerun the
self-review and rewrite the section in `.scratch/<branch>/pr.md`; never
just edit the SHA. The `Reviewed:` SHA must be the head of the pull
request. The pull request body is replaced right after the push.
## Agent skills
### Issue tracker
GitHub issues of the upstream repository `Akkudoktor-EOS/EOS`. See
`docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.
### Domain docs
Single-context: `GLOSSARY.md` and `docs/adr/` at the repository root. See
`docs/agents/domain.md`.
## Completion checklist
Before considering a change complete:
- [ ] New and renamed files comply with the filename rules in `pyproject.toml`.
- [ ] The filename linter passes.
- [ ] Tests have been added or updated as appropriate.
- [ ] Relevant pytest tests pass.
- [ ] Ruff checks pass.
- [ ] Mypy checks pass where applicable.
- [ ] Configuration and documentation updated when necessary.
- [ ] No unrelated changes or unnecessary exceptions introduced.
- [ ] Self-review done, hard violations fixed, judgement calls reported.
- [ ] `.scratch/<branch>/pr.md` holds an up-to-date `## Self-review` section.