Files
EOS/tests/test_inverter_efficiency.py
T
AndreasandClaude Opus 4.8 67cf6f7d8a feat(optimization): schedule any number of flexible consumers
Replace the single hourly "dishwasher" home appliance with a list of
flexible consumers (home_appliances). Each consumer defines its load
either as an explicit power profile (energy-preservingly resampled onto
the optimization slot grid, incl. 15-min and non-integer interval ratios)
or the flat consumption_wh/duration_h fallback, and runs ONCE or DAILY
within its time windows and the optimization horizon.

- ConsumerScheduleMode + shared load-definition validation (XOR of
  profile/fallback, reject negative/NaN/inf, unique device_id)
- ApplianceGeneLayout: variable appliance gene block (index into
  allowed_start_slots), ONCE/DAILY calendar-day based, no snapping
- per-device output: result.home_appliance_energy_wh, appliance_starts
  (absolute local times), per-device solution columns and DDBC RUN/OFF
  instructions on state transitions only
- deprecate dishwasher/washingstart/Home_appliance_wh_per_hour with
  backward-compatible mapping and explicit conflict rejection
- max_home_appliances is now an upper bound only; no demo appliance and
  no on/off behaviour
- docs, openapi.json, CHANGELOG and optimize_result_2* fixtures updated;
  new tests/test_homeappliance.py covers the mandatory test matrix

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-15 14:19:46 +02:00

987 lines
39 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
"""Tests for inverter AC/DC efficiency separation and AC charging break-even penalty.
Tests the new inverter parameters:
- dc_to_ac_efficiency: DC→AC conversion loss on battery discharge
- ac_to_dc_efficiency: AC→DC conversion loss on grid-to-battery charging
- max_ac_charge_power_w: Maximum AC charging power limit
And the economic break-even penalty in GeneticOptimization.evaluate():
- Penalises AC grid charging that cannot be recovered given round-trip losses and future prices
- Respects free PV-charged energy already in battery when ranking future discharge hours
"""
from types import SimpleNamespace
from typing import cast
from unittest.mock import Mock, patch
import numpy as np
import pytest
from akkudoktoreos.devices.genetic.battery import Battery
from akkudoktoreos.devices.genetic.inverter import Inverter
from akkudoktoreos.optimization.genetic.geneticdevices import (
InverterParameters,
SolarPanelBatteryParameters,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Helpers / Fixtures
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _make_inverter(
dc_to_ac_efficiency: float = 1.0,
ac_to_dc_efficiency: float = 1.0,
max_ac_charge_power_w=None,
max_power_wh: float = 10000.0,
mock_battery=None,
) -> Inverter:
"""Create an Inverter with custom efficiency parameters and a mock battery."""
mock_self_consumption_predictor = Mock()
mock_self_consumption_predictor.calculate_expected_direct_consumption.side_effect = min
params = InverterParameters(
device_id="inv1",
max_power_wh=max_power_wh,
battery_id=mock_battery.parameters.device_id if mock_battery else None,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=dc_to_ac_efficiency,
ac_to_dc_efficiency=ac_to_dc_efficiency,
max_ac_charge_power_w=max_ac_charge_power_w,
)
with patch(
"akkudoktoreos.devices.genetic.inverter.get_eos_load_interpolator",
return_value=mock_self_consumption_predictor,
):
return Inverter(params, battery=mock_battery)
@pytest.fixture
def mock_battery() -> Mock:
mock_bat = Mock()
mock_bat.charge_energy = Mock(return_value=(0.0, 0.0))
mock_bat.discharge_energy = Mock(return_value=(0.0, 0.0))
mock_bat.parameters.device_id = "battery1"
return mock_bat
# ===================================================================
# 1. InverterParameters new fields and defaults
# ===================================================================
class TestInverterParametersDefaults:
"""Verify backward-compatible defaults for new parameters."""
def test_defaults(self):
params = InverterParameters(device_id="inv1", max_power_wh=5000)
assert params.dc_to_ac_efficiency == 1.0
assert params.ac_to_dc_efficiency == 1.0
assert params.max_ac_charge_power_w is None
def test_custom_values(self):
params = InverterParameters(
device_id="inv1",
max_power_wh=5000,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
max_ac_charge_power_w=3000,
)
assert params.dc_to_ac_efficiency == 0.95
assert params.ac_to_dc_efficiency == 0.93
assert params.max_ac_charge_power_w == 3000
def test_ac_to_dc_zero_disables_ac_charging(self):
params = InverterParameters(
device_id="inv1", max_power_wh=5000, ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.0
)
assert params.ac_to_dc_efficiency == 0.0
def test_dc_to_ac_must_be_positive(self):
with pytest.raises(Exception):
InverterParameters(device_id="inv1", max_power_wh=5000, dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.0)
def test_max_ac_charge_power_zero(self):
params = InverterParameters(
device_id="inv1", max_power_wh=5000, max_ac_charge_power_w=0
)
assert params.max_ac_charge_power_w == 0
# ===================================================================
# 2. dc_to_ac_efficiency battery discharge through inverter
# ===================================================================
class TestDcToAcEfficiency:
"""Battery discharge energy is reduced by dc_to_ac_efficiency."""
def test_discharge_shortfall_with_95_percent_efficiency(self, mock_battery):
"""With 0.95 efficiency, 100 Wh DC from battery → 95 Wh AC delivered."""
mock_battery.discharge_energy.return_value = (100.0, 10.0)
inv = _make_inverter(dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95, mock_battery=mock_battery)
generation = 0.0
consumption = 200.0
hour = 5
grid_export, grid_import, losses, self_consumption = inv.process_energy(
generation, consumption, hour
)
# Battery delivers 100 Wh DC → 95 Wh AC after inverter
# Inverter loss = 100 - 95 = 5 Wh
battery_discharge_ac = 100.0 * 0.95 # 95 Wh
assert self_consumption == pytest.approx(generation + battery_discharge_ac, rel=1e-5)
assert grid_import == pytest.approx(consumption - battery_discharge_ac, rel=1e-5)
# Total losses = battery internal (10) + inverter DC→AC (5)
expected_losses = 10.0 + (100.0 * 0.05)
assert losses == pytest.approx(expected_losses, rel=1e-5)
# Battery was asked for more DC to compensate for inverter loss
# ac_needed = min(200, max_power_wh - 0) = 200
# dc_request = 200 / 0.95 ≈ 210.526
expected_dc_request = 200.0 / 0.95
mock_battery.discharge_energy.assert_called_once_with(
pytest.approx(expected_dc_request, rel=1e-3), hour
)
def test_discharge_with_100_percent_efficiency_unchanged(self, mock_battery):
"""With 1.0 efficiency, behavior is identical to the legacy model."""
mock_battery.discharge_energy.return_value = (100.0, 10.0)
inv = _make_inverter(dc_to_ac_efficiency=1.0, mock_battery=mock_battery)
generation = 100.0
consumption = 300.0
hour = 5
grid_export, grid_import, losses, self_consumption = inv.process_energy(
generation, consumption, hour
)
# No inverter loss: battery_discharge_ac = 100 Wh
assert self_consumption == pytest.approx(200.0, rel=1e-5)
assert grid_import == pytest.approx(100.0, rel=1e-5)
assert losses == pytest.approx(10.0, rel=1e-5) # Only battery losses
def test_discharge_surplus_path_with_efficiency(self, mock_battery):
"""A probabilistic load gap discharges through the inverter."""
mock_battery.discharge_energy.return_value = (30.0 / 0.90, 5.0)
mock_battery.charge_energy.return_value = (100.0, 10.0)
inv = _make_inverter(dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.90, mock_battery=mock_battery)
predictor = cast(Mock, inv.self_consumption_predictor)
predictor.calculate_expected_direct_consumption.side_effect = None
predictor.calculate_expected_direct_consumption.return_value = 170.0
generation = 500.0
consumption = 200.0
hour = 5
grid_export, grid_import, losses, self_consumption = inv.process_energy(
generation, consumption, hour
)
# Expected direct PV is 170 Wh, leaving 30 Wh of load gap and
# 330 Wh of PV surplus within different sub-periods of the slot.
# DC request for discharge = 30 / 0.90 = 33.333 Wh.
expected_dc_request = 30.0 / 0.90
mock_battery.discharge_energy.assert_called_once_with(
pytest.approx(expected_dc_request, rel=1e-3), hour
)
# Battery delivers 33.333 Wh DC -> 30 Wh AC.
from_battery_dc = 30.0 / 0.90
from_battery_ac = from_battery_dc * 0.90
inverter_discharge_loss = from_battery_dc - from_battery_ac
assert self_consumption == pytest.approx(170.0 + from_battery_ac, rel=1e-5)
assert grid_import == pytest.approx(0.0)
assert grid_export == pytest.approx(220.0)
assert losses == pytest.approx(5.0 + inverter_discharge_loss + 10.0)
# ===================================================================
# 3. ac_to_dc_efficiency + max_ac_charge_power_w in simulation
# ===================================================================
class TestAcChargingInSimulation:
"""Test AC charging logic with inverter efficiency in GeneticSimulation.
These tests use a real Battery object (not a mock) and directly exercise
the AC charging path in GeneticSimulation.simulate().
"""
@pytest.fixture
def simulation_setup(self, config_eos):
"""Set up a minimal GeneticSimulation with battery and inverter."""
from akkudoktoreos.optimization.genetic.genetic import GeneticSimulation
from akkudoktoreos.optimization.genetic.geneticparams import (
GeneticEnergyManagementParameters,
)
config_eos.merge_settings_from_dict(
{"prediction": {"hours": 48}, "optimization": {"hours": 24}}
)
prediction_hours = config_eos.prediction.hours
def _build(
ac_to_dc_efficiency: float = 1.0,
dc_to_ac_efficiency: float = 1.0,
max_ac_charge_power_w=None,
battery_capacity_wh: int = 10000,
battery_charging_efficiency: float = 0.90,
battery_discharging_efficiency: float = 0.90,
battery_initial_soc_pct: int = 50,
battery_max_charge_power_w: int = 5000,
):
akku = Battery(
SolarPanelBatteryParameters(
device_id="battery1",
capacity_wh=battery_capacity_wh,
initial_soc_percentage=battery_initial_soc_pct,
charging_efficiency=battery_charging_efficiency,
discharging_efficiency=battery_discharging_efficiency,
min_soc_percentage=0,
max_soc_percentage=100,
max_charge_power_w=battery_max_charge_power_w,
),
prediction_hours=prediction_hours,
)
akku.reset()
inverter = Inverter(
InverterParameters(
device_id="inverter1",
max_power_wh=10000,
battery_id="battery1",
ac_to_dc_efficiency=ac_to_dc_efficiency,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=dc_to_ac_efficiency,
max_ac_charge_power_w=max_ac_charge_power_w,
),
battery=akku,
)
sim = GeneticSimulation()
sim.prepare(
GeneticEnergyManagementParameters(
pv_prognose_wh=[0.0] * prediction_hours, # No PV
strompreis_euro_pro_wh=[0.0003] * prediction_hours, # ~30ct/kWh
einspeiseverguetung_euro_pro_wh=0.00008,
preis_euro_pro_wh_akku=0.0001,
gesamtlast=[1000.0] * prediction_hours, # 1 kW constant load
),
optimization_hours=config_eos.optimization.horizon_hours,
prediction_hours=prediction_hours,
inverter=inverter,
ev=None,
home_appliances=None,
)
return sim, akku, inverter
return _build
def test_ac_charge_with_unity_efficiency_backward_compat(self, simulation_setup):
"""With ac_to_dc_efficiency=1.0, behavior matches legacy model."""
sim, akku, inverter = simulation_setup(ac_to_dc_efficiency=1.0)
# Enable AC charging for hour 1 at 50% power
sim.ac_charge_hours[1] = 0.5
sim.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 0
result = sim.simulate(start_hour=0)
# At hour 1: AC charge at 50% of 5000W = 2500W DC requested
# With efficiency 1.0, AC consumed from grid = DC = 2500W
# Battery stores: 2500 * 0.90 (battery eff) = 2250 Wh
# Battery loss: 2500 - 2250 = 250 Wh
# Total grid consumption for that hour = 1000 (load) + 2500 (AC charge)
hour_idx = 1
assert result["Netzbezug_Wh_pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(3500.0, rel=1e-3)
assert result["Verluste_Pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(250.0, rel=1e-3)
def test_ac_charge_with_95_percent_efficiency(self, simulation_setup):
"""With ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.95, more AC energy is consumed for same DC charge."""
sim, akku, inverter = simulation_setup(ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.95)
sim.ac_charge_hours[1] = 0.5
sim.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 0
result = sim.simulate(start_hour=0)
# At hour 1: AC charge at 50% of 5000W = 2500W DC requested
# With ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.95:
# AC consumed = 2500 / 0.95 ≈ 2631.58 Wh
# Inverter loss = 2631.58 - 2500 = 131.58 Wh
# Battery stores: 2500 * 0.90 = 2250 Wh
# Battery loss: 2500 - 2250 = 250 Wh
# Total losses: 250 + 131.58 = 381.58 Wh
hour_idx = 1
dc_energy = 2500.0
ac_energy = dc_energy / 0.95
inverter_loss = ac_energy - dc_energy
battery_loss = dc_energy * (1 - 0.90)
total_loss = battery_loss + inverter_loss
expected_grid = 1000.0 + ac_energy
assert result["Netzbezug_Wh_pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(
expected_grid, rel=1e-3
)
assert result["Verluste_Pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(total_loss, rel=1e-3)
def test_ac_charge_disabled_by_zero_efficiency(self, simulation_setup):
"""With ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.0, AC charging is completely disabled."""
sim, akku, inverter = simulation_setup(ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.0)
sim.ac_charge_hours[1] = 1.0 # Try to AC charge
sim.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 0
initial_soc = akku.soc_wh
result = sim.simulate(start_hour=0)
# Battery should not charge at all (AC charging disabled)
# Grid consumption = only load
hour_idx = 1
assert result["Netzbezug_Wh_pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(1000.0, rel=1e-3)
# Battery SoC should not change (no ac charge, no dc charge, no discharge)
assert result["akku_soc_pro_stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(50.0, rel=1e-3)
def test_ac_charge_disabled_by_zero_max_power(self, simulation_setup):
"""With max_ac_charge_power_w=0, AC charging is disabled."""
sim, akku, inverter = simulation_setup(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.95, max_ac_charge_power_w=0
)
sim.ac_charge_hours[1] = 1.0
sim.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 0
result = sim.simulate(start_hour=0)
hour_idx = 1
assert result["Netzbezug_Wh_pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(1000.0, rel=1e-3)
assert result["akku_soc_pro_stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(50.0, rel=1e-3)
def test_ac_charge_limited_by_max_ac_power(self, simulation_setup):
"""max_ac_charge_power_w limits the effective charge factor."""
# battery max_charge_power_w = 5000, ac_to_dc_efficiency = 0.95
# max_ac_charge_power_w = 2000
# max_dc_factor = (2000 * 0.95) / 5000 = 0.38
sim, akku, inverter = simulation_setup(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.95, max_ac_charge_power_w=2000
)
sim.ac_charge_hours[1] = 1.0 # Request full power
sim.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 0
result = sim.simulate(start_hour=0)
# Effective charge factor is capped at 0.38
# DC energy = 5000 * 0.38 = 1900 W
# AC energy = 1900 / 0.95 = 2000 W (respects limit)
hour_idx = 1
max_dc_factor = (2000 * 0.95) / 5000
dc_energy = 5000 * max_dc_factor
ac_energy = dc_energy / 0.95
expected_grid = 1000.0 + ac_energy # load + AC charge
assert result["Netzbezug_Wh_pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(
expected_grid, rel=1e-2
)
def test_discharge_with_dc_to_ac_efficiency(self, simulation_setup):
"""dc_to_ac_efficiency affects how much AC energy is delivered from battery."""
sim, akku, inverter = simulation_setup(
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.90, battery_initial_soc_pct=80
)
# No PV, no AC charge, discharge only
sim.ac_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim.dc_charge_hours[:] = 1
sim.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 1
result = sim.simulate(start_hour=0)
# With dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.90, battery discharge delivers less AC
# This means more grid import compared to efficiency=1.0
# At hour 0: load=1000, PV=0
# Shortfall = 1000
# DC request = 1000 / 0.90 ≈ 1111 Wh
# Battery delivers (limited by capacity and efficiency):
# max raw = min(soc - min_soc, max_charge_power) = min(8000, 5000) = 5000
# max deliverable DC = 5000 * 0.90 (battery eff) = 4500
# delivered DC = min(1111, 4500) = 1111 Wh
# delivered AC = 1111 * 0.90 = 1000 Wh → covers full load
# So grid_import should be ≈ 0 for first hours while battery has charge
hour_idx = 0
assert result["Netzbezug_Wh_pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] == pytest.approx(0.0, abs=5.0)
# But losses should be higher due to inverter DC→AC conversion
# Inverter loss = 1111 * 0.10 = 111 Wh
# Battery loss = raw_used - delivered = delivered/bat_eff - delivered
# = 1111/0.90 - 1111 ≈ 123.5 Wh
assert result["Verluste_Pro_Stunde"][hour_idx] > 200.0 # Significant losses
def test_round_trip_efficiency_cost_impact(self, simulation_setup):
"""Verify AC charge + discharge round-trip losses increase total cost."""
# Reference run: no inverter losses
sim_ref, akku_ref, inv_ref = simulation_setup(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=1.0, dc_to_ac_efficiency=1.0
)
sim_ref.ac_charge_hours[1] = 0.5
sim_ref.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim_ref.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 1
sim_ref.bat_discharge_hours[1] = 0 # Don't discharge while charging
result_ref = sim_ref.simulate(start_hour=0)
# Test run: with inverter losses
sim_test, akku_test, inv_test = simulation_setup(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93, dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.93
)
sim_test.ac_charge_hours[1] = 0.5
sim_test.dc_charge_hours[:] = 0
sim_test.bat_discharge_hours[:] = 1
sim_test.bat_discharge_hours[1] = 0
result_test = sim_test.simulate(start_hour=0)
# With inverter losses, total cost should be HIGHER
assert result_test["Gesamtkosten_Euro"] > result_ref["Gesamtkosten_Euro"]
# And total losses should be HIGHER
assert result_test["Gesamt_Verluste"] > result_ref["Gesamt_Verluste"]
# ===================================================================
# 4. Integration with optimizer residual battery value
# ===================================================================
class TestResidualBatteryValue:
"""Verify that dc_to_ac_efficiency affects residual battery value calculation."""
def test_current_energy_content_unaffected(self):
"""Battery.current_energy_content() is DC-only; inverter eff applied in optimizer."""
akku = Battery(
SolarPanelBatteryParameters(
device_id="bat1",
capacity_wh=10000,
initial_soc_percentage=50,
discharging_efficiency=0.90,
min_soc_percentage=0,
),
prediction_hours=24,
)
akku.reset()
# DC energy content: (5000 - 0) * 0.90 = 4500
assert akku.current_energy_content() == pytest.approx(4500.0, rel=1e-5)
# ===================================================================
# 5. AC charging break-even penalty in GeneticOptimization.evaluate()
# ===================================================================
def _make_mock_simulation(
*,
# Inverter properties
ac_to_dc_efficiency: float = 0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency: float = 0.95,
# Battery properties
charging_efficiency: float = 0.95,
discharging_efficiency: float = 0.95,
capacity_wh: float = 10_000.0,
initial_soc_percentage: float = 0.0, # fraction of capacity already stored (0 = empty)
min_soc_wh: float = 0.0,
max_charge_power_w: float = 5_000.0,
levelized_cost_of_storage_kwh: float = 0.0,
# Arrays (must be same length)
ac_charge_hours: list | None = None,
elect_price_hourly: list | None = None,
load_energy_array: list | None = None,
):
"""Return a mock GeneticSimulation with configurable properties for penalty tests."""
n = 24
if ac_charge_hours is None:
ac_charge_hours = [0.0] * n
if elect_price_hourly is None:
elect_price_hourly = [0.0003] * n # 30 ct/kWh flat
if load_energy_array is None:
load_energy_array = [1000.0] * n # 1 kWh constant load
inv = SimpleNamespace(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=ac_to_dc_efficiency,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=dc_to_ac_efficiency,
)
bat = SimpleNamespace(
charging_efficiency=charging_efficiency,
discharging_efficiency=discharging_efficiency,
capacity_wh=capacity_wh,
initial_soc_percentage=initial_soc_percentage,
min_soc_wh=min_soc_wh,
max_charge_power_w=max_charge_power_w,
levelized_cost_of_storage_kwh=levelized_cost_of_storage_kwh,
current_energy_content=Mock(return_value=0.0),
)
sim = Mock()
sim.battery = bat
sim.inverter = inv
sim.ev = None
sim.ac_charge_hours = np.array(ac_charge_hours, dtype=float)
sim.elect_price_hourly = np.array(elect_price_hourly, dtype=float)
sim.load_energy_array = np.array(load_energy_array, dtype=float)
return sim
def _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(
config_eos,
mock_sim,
*,
ac_charge_break_even: float = 1.0,
start_hour: int = 0,
base_gesamtbilanz: float = 0.0,
):
"""
Patch a GeneticOptimization so that:
- evaluate_inner() returns a controlled base Gesamtbilanz_Euro
- self.simulation is replaced by mock_sim
Then call evaluate() and return the fitness tuple.
"""
from akkudoktoreos.optimization.genetic.genetic import (
ApplianceGeneLayout,
GeneticOptimization,
)
config_eos.merge_settings_from_dict(
{
"prediction": {"hours": 48},
"optimization": {"hours": 24},
}
)
config_eos.optimization.genetic.penalties = {
"ev_soc_miss": 10,
"ac_charge_break_even": ac_charge_break_even,
}
optim = GeneticOptimization.__new__(GeneticOptimization)
# Minimal __init__ state expected by evaluate()
optim.config = config_eos
optim.optimize_ev = False
optim.verbose = False
optim.opti_param = {"home_appliance": 0}
optim.appliance_layout = ApplianceGeneLayout([])
optim.simulation = mock_sim
# evaluate_inner() just returns the base balance; we test the *additional* penalty
dummy_result = {
"Gesamtbilanz_Euro": base_gesamtbilanz,
"Gesamt_Verluste": 0.0,
"EAuto_SoC_pro_Stunde": np.zeros(48),
}
# DEAP individuals are lists that accept attribute assignment; use a trivial subclass
class _Ind(list): # noqa: N801
pass
fake_individual = _Ind([0] * 48)
with patch.object(optim, "evaluate_inner", return_value=dummy_result):
fitness = optim.evaluate(
fake_individual,
parameters=Mock(
ems=Mock(preis_euro_pro_wh_akku=0.0),
eauto=None,
),
start_hour=start_hour,
worst_case=False,
)
return fitness[0]
def _run_evaluate_with_mocked_ev_soc(config_eos, ev_soc_percentage: float) -> float:
"""Return fitness for a mocked EV SoC while EV optimization is active."""
from akkudoktoreos.optimization.genetic.genetic import (
ApplianceGeneLayout,
GeneticOptimization,
)
config_eos.merge_settings_from_dict(
{
"prediction": {"hours": 48},
"optimization": {"hours": 48},
}
)
config_eos.optimization.genetic.penalties = {
"ev_soc_miss": 10,
"ac_charge_break_even": 1.0,
}
optim = GeneticOptimization.__new__(GeneticOptimization)
optim.config = config_eos
optim.optimize_ev = True
optim.verbose = False
optim.opti_param = {"home_appliance": 0}
optim.appliance_layout = ApplianceGeneLayout([])
mock_ev = Mock()
mock_ev.current_soc_percentage.return_value = ev_soc_percentage
sim = Mock()
sim.battery = None
sim.inverter = None
sim.ev = mock_ev
sim.ac_charge_hours = None
sim.elect_price_hourly = None
sim.load_energy_array = None
optim.simulation = sim
dummy_result = {
"Gesamtbilanz_Euro": 1.0,
"Gesamt_Verluste": 0.0,
"EAuto_SoC_pro_Stunde": np.zeros(48),
}
class _Ind(list): # noqa: N801
pass
fake_individual = _Ind([0] * 96)
with patch.object(optim, "evaluate_inner", return_value=dummy_result):
fitness = optim.evaluate(
fake_individual,
parameters=Mock(
ems=Mock(preis_euro_pro_wh_akku=0.0),
eauto=Mock(min_soc_percentage=70, max_soc_percentage=100),
),
start_hour=0,
worst_case=False,
)
return fitness[0]
class TestEvSocPenalty:
"""EV SoC target is a minimum-only penalty."""
def test_ev_soc_below_min_adds_penalty(self, config_eos):
assert _run_evaluate_with_mocked_ev_soc(config_eos, 65) == pytest.approx(51.0)
def test_ev_soc_above_max_does_not_add_min_soc_penalty(self, config_eos):
assert _run_evaluate_with_mocked_ev_soc(config_eos, 105) == pytest.approx(1.0)
class TestAcChargeBreakEvenPenalty:
"""Break-even penalty in GeneticOptimization.evaluate().
The penalty adds a positive (bad) contribution to the fitness score whenever
AC grid charging is scheduled at an hour where the round-trip loss means the
stored energy can never be discharged at a price sufficient to recover costs,
taking into account that free PV-charged energy already in the battery covers
the most expensive future hours first.
"""
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5a. No AC charging → no penalty
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_no_ac_charging_no_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""When no AC charging is scheduled, fitness equals the base balance."""
n = 24
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_charge_hours=[0.0] * n,
elect_price_hourly=[0.0003] * n,
load_energy_array=[1000.0] * n,
)
base = 1.5
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=base)
assert fitness == pytest.approx(base, rel=1e-9)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5b. AC charging profitable → no penalty
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_profitable_ac_charging_no_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""When future discharge price > P_charge / η, charging is justified → no penalty."""
n = 24
# Charge at hour 0: 0.0001 €/Wh
# Round-trip: 0.93 * 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 ≈ 0.7975
# break-even price ≈ 0.0001 / 0.7975 ≈ 0.0001254 €/Wh
# Future hour 1 price: 0.0003 > break-even → profitable
prices = [0.0001] + [0.0003] * (n - 1)
ac_charge = [1.0] + [0.0] * (n - 1)
loads = [1000.0] * n
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
charging_efficiency=0.95,
discharging_efficiency=0.95,
ac_charge_hours=ac_charge,
elect_price_hourly=prices,
load_energy_array=loads,
initial_soc_percentage=0.0, # empty battery → no free PV energy
)
base = 0.0
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=base)
# penalty should be 0 (or very small due to floating-point rounding)
assert fitness == pytest.approx(base, abs=1e-9)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5c. AC charging unprofitable → penalty fires
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_unprofitable_ac_charging_adds_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""When future discharge prices are too low to justify AC charging, penalty is added."""
n = 24
# Charge at hour 0: 0.0004 €/Wh
# Round-trip: 0.93 * 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 ≈ 0.7975
# break-even price ≈ 0.0004 / 0.7975 ≈ 0.000501 €/Wh
# All future prices: 0.0003 < break-even → unprofitable
prices = [0.0004] + [0.0003] * (n - 1)
ac_charge = [1.0] + [0.0] * (n - 1)
loads = [1000.0] * n
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
charging_efficiency=0.95,
discharging_efficiency=0.95,
ac_charge_hours=ac_charge,
elect_price_hourly=prices,
load_energy_array=loads,
initial_soc_percentage=0.0,
)
base = 0.0
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=base)
# Fitness must be worse (higher) than base
assert fitness > base + 1e-6
def test_lcos_is_included_in_ac_charge_break_even_price(self, config_eos):
"""LCOS can make an otherwise profitable price spread unprofitable."""
n = 24
prices = [0.0001] + [0.00015] * (n - 1)
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=1.0,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=1.0,
charging_efficiency=1.0,
discharging_efficiency=1.0,
levelized_cost_of_storage_kwh=0.10,
ac_charge_hours=[1.0] + [0.0] * (n - 1),
elect_price_hourly=prices,
load_energy_array=[1000.0] * n,
initial_soc_percentage=0.0,
)
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim)
# Break-even is 0.0001 + 0.0001 = 0.0002 EUR/Wh.
# The 0.00005 EUR/Wh gap on a 5000 Wh charge adds 0.25 EUR.
assert fitness == pytest.approx(0.25)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5d. Free PV energy covers expensive hours → penalty reduced/eliminated
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_free_pv_energy_eliminates_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""PV energy covers the best future hour; penalty is larger than without PV energy."""
n = 24
# Charge at hour 0: 0.0005 €/Wh
# Round-trip: 0.93*0.95*0.95*0.95 ≈ 0.7974
# break-even ≈ 0.0005 / 0.7974 ≈ 0.000627 €/Wh
#
# Future: one expensive hour at 0.0006 (< break-even!) and rest at 0.0003
# → even the best future price 0.0006 < 0.000627 → AC charging is never profitable
#
# Empty battery: best_uncovered = 0.0006 < 0.000627 → penalty fires
# With PV (50% SoC → ~4512 Wh deliverable free AC): covers the 0.0006 hour (1000 Wh)
# → best_uncovered drops to 0.0003 → penalty fires with LARGER excess
prices = [0.0005] + [0.0003] * (n - 2) + [0.0006] # expensive hour at end
ac_charge = [1.0] + [0.0] * (n - 1)
loads = [1000.0] * n
sim_empty = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
charging_efficiency=0.95,
discharging_efficiency=0.95,
ac_charge_hours=list(ac_charge),
elect_price_hourly=list(prices),
load_energy_array=list(loads),
initial_soc_percentage=0.0, # no free PV energy
)
sim_with_pv = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
charging_efficiency=0.95,
discharging_efficiency=0.95,
ac_charge_hours=list(ac_charge),
elect_price_hourly=list(prices),
load_energy_array=list(loads),
capacity_wh=10_000.0,
initial_soc_percentage=50.0, # 5000 Wh free PV energy → ~4512 Wh deliverable AC
)
fitness_empty = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim_empty, base_gesamtbilanz=0.0)
fitness_pv = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim_with_pv, base_gesamtbilanz=0.0)
# Both are penalised (break-even > max future price)
assert fitness_empty > 1e-6, "Empty battery: best_uncovered=0.0006 < break_even→ penalty"
assert fitness_pv > 1e-6, "With PV: free energy covers 0.0006 hour, best drops to 0.0003"
# With PV the expensive hour is covered for free → uncovered best price is lower
# → excess_cost_per_wh = break_even - best_uncovered is larger → penalty is BIGGER
assert fitness_pv > fitness_empty, "PV covers expensive hour → uncovered best is cheaper"
def test_free_pv_energy_exposes_only_cheap_future_prices(self, config_eos):
"""When PV covers ALL expensive hours, best_uncovered_price = 0 → max penalty."""
n = 5
capacity_wh = 10_000.0
# Free PV: initial 80% → (8000 - 0) * 0.95 * 0.95 = 7220 Wh deliverable AC
# Future loads: 2 expensive hours × 1000 Wh = 2000 Wh → all covered by free PV
prices = [0.0010, 0.0008, 0.0008, 0.0002, 0.0002]
ac_charge = [1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0]
loads = [1000.0] * n
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
charging_efficiency=0.95,
discharging_efficiency=0.95,
capacity_wh=capacity_wh,
initial_soc_percentage=80.0,
ac_charge_hours=ac_charge,
elect_price_hourly=prices,
load_energy_array=loads,
)
# break_even = 0.001 / (0.93*0.95*0.95*0.95) ≈ 0.001254
# PV covers both 0.0008 hours → best_uncovered = 0.0002 → penalty fires
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=0.0)
assert fitness > 1e-6
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5e. Penalty factor scales the penalty
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_penalty_factor_scales_linearly(self, config_eos):
"""The ac_charge_break_even factor doubles the penalty when doubled."""
n = 24
prices = [0.0004] + [0.0003] * (n - 1)
ac_charge = [1.0] + [0.0] * (n - 1)
loads = [1000.0] * n
def _fitness(factor):
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_to_dc_efficiency=0.93,
dc_to_ac_efficiency=0.95,
charging_efficiency=0.95,
discharging_efficiency=0.95,
ac_charge_hours=list(ac_charge),
elect_price_hourly=list(prices),
load_energy_array=list(loads),
initial_soc_percentage=0.0,
)
return _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(
config_eos, sim, ac_charge_break_even=factor, base_gesamtbilanz=0.0
)
f1 = _fitness(1.0)
f2 = _fitness(2.0)
# With factor=2 the penalty should be exactly double
assert f2 == pytest.approx(2.0 * f1, rel=1e-6)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5f. Zero or negative AC charge factor → no penalty contribution
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_zero_ac_charge_factor_no_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""ac_charge_hours[h] = 0 means no charging, so no penalty."""
n = 24
prices = [0.0010] * n # Expensive, but no AC charging
ac_charge = [0.0] * n
loads = [1000.0] * n
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_charge_hours=ac_charge,
elect_price_hourly=prices,
load_energy_array=loads,
)
base = 3.0
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=base)
assert fitness == pytest.approx(base, abs=1e-9)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5g. No battery / inverter → penalty skipped entirely
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_no_battery_skips_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""When no battery is present, the penalty block is skipped."""
n = 24
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_charge_hours=[1.0] * n,
elect_price_hourly=[0.001] * n,
load_energy_array=[1000.0] * n,
)
sim.battery = None # no battery → penalty skipped
base = 2.5
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=base)
assert fitness == pytest.approx(base, abs=1e-9)
def test_no_inverter_skips_penalty(self, config_eos):
"""When no inverter is present, the penalty block is skipped."""
n = 24
sim = _make_mock_simulation(
ac_charge_hours=[1.0] * n,
elect_price_hourly=[0.001] * n,
load_energy_array=[1000.0] * n,
)
sim.inverter = None # no inverter → penalty skipped
base = 2.5
fitness = _run_evaluate_with_mocked_sim(config_eos, sim, base_gesamtbilanz=base)
assert fitness == pytest.approx(base, abs=1e-9)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# 5h. Unit-level break-even maths (no optimizer setup needed)
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
def test_break_even_formula(self):
"""Verify the break-even formula: P_break_even = P_charge / η_round_trip."""
ac_to_dc = 0.93
bat_charge = 0.95
bat_discharge = 0.95
dc_to_ac = 0.95
eta_rt = ac_to_dc * bat_charge * bat_discharge * dc_to_ac
p_charge = 0.0004 # 40 ct/kWh
break_even = p_charge / eta_rt
# 1 Wh drawn from grid at p_charge → η_rt Wh delivered
# Need discharge price ≥ p_charge / η_rt to break even
assert break_even == pytest.approx(p_charge / eta_rt, rel=1e-9)
assert break_even > p_charge # Always worse due to losses
def test_free_pv_energy_formula(self):
"""Verify free pv energy: (initial_soc - min_soc) × η_bat_dis × η_inv_dis."""
capacity_wh = 10_000.0
initial_soc_pct = 60.0
min_soc_wh = 500.0
bat_dis = 0.95
inv_dis = 0.95
initial_soc_wh = (initial_soc_pct / 100.0) * capacity_wh # 6000
free_ac_wh = max(0.0, initial_soc_wh - min_soc_wh) * bat_dis * inv_dis
# = (6000 - 500) * 0.95 * 0.95 = 5500 * 0.9025 = 4963.75
expected = 5500.0 * 0.95 * 0.95
assert free_ac_wh == pytest.approx(expected, rel=1e-9)