mirror of
https://github.com/Akkudoktor-EOS/EOS.git
synced 2026-11-13 01:03:45 +01:00
Bobby NoelteandClaude Opus 5.5
dd41e5d57c
Additional changes Agents write a task plan to .scratch/<branch>/plan.md and self-review with code-review Agents fix hard violations, report judgement calls and rerun the self-review before every push Agents declare the review in a Self-review section of the pull request body Add the ai-self-review workflow and scripts/check_pr_self_review.py for pull requests into main Detect agents by Assisted-by or Anthropic Co-Authored-By trailers, body markers or the AI box Fail only on a missing Self-review section or a missing, malformed or stale Reviewed SHA Note an unticked AI-assisted box and malformed optional lines without failing Comment on the pull request how to fix a failure and update that one comment on later runs Show the same report in the job summary and accept Windows line endings in the body Skip dependabot and release pull requests Run on pull_request_target with the base branch's script, never pull request code Add the pull request template: the pr skill's sections plus Checklist and Self-review Require always valid optimization parameters in the energy-domain skill Require datetimeutil for date and time handling in new and changed code in AGENTS.md Require the Assisted-by trailer on agent commits in the commit-messages skill Add tests for the check in tests/test_ai.py Add GLOSSARY.md and the agent tracker docs in docs/agents/ Add decision record docs/adr/0001 with an ADR index in the docs toctree Document the workflow in docs/develop/ai.md and CONTRIBUTING.md Exclude docs/agents from Sphinx and PyMarkdown and ignore .scratch/ Document cz check instead of make gitlint for commit messages in docs/develop/ai.md Assisted-by: Claude Code (claude-opus-5-5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
39 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
39 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
## Summary
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
The smallest view that makes the change clear, next to short text: pseudocode, a call or file
|
|
tree, a diff sketch or a Mermaid diagram. Reference the issue, e.g. "Closes #123". Sections follow
|
|
the pr skill, see ai/skills/engineering/pr/SKILL.md.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Evidence
|
|
|
|
<!-- Before and after: a failing and passing test run, console output or a screenshot. -->
|
|
|
|
## Merge Danger
|
|
|
|
**Door:** <!-- one-way or two-way: can the change be walked back cheaply? -->
|
|
|
|
**Blast Radius:** <!-- one word: who or what is affected if it goes wrong -->
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Optional, when they apply:
|
|
**Breaking:** what users, configurations or integrations must change.
|
|
**Security:** what the change means for security.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [ ] AI-assisted (an agent wrote or co-wrote part of this PR)
|
|
- [ ] I reviewed the complete diff myself (author review)
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
If the pull request is AI-assisted, CI requires the section below with the full SHA of the head
|
|
commit in its Reviewed: line. The agent writes the section from its self-review of the current head
|
|
commit. Before every push, rerun the self-review and rewrite the section, do not just edit the
|
|
SHA; replace the body right after the push. See docs/develop/ai.md.
|
|
Delete the section if the pull request is not AI-assisted.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Self-review
|